Friendship is a mutual experience. Because you are friends
with other individuals, you get to share in mutual experiences in which you
would not have otherwise considered. This is why a Saturday night a few weeks
ago, I found myself in an auditorium watching the Miss Thomasville pageant
competition cheering on one of my good friends. The pageant circuit is
something that I have only been privy to through such things as “Toddlers in
Tiaras” or “Miss Congeniality”.
The pageant world is an abnormality to me. Growing up, and
many would say I still am, I was the biggest tomboy. My mother would have
fights with me if we had to go to an event that required a dress. I would have
rather been in shorts and a t-shirt riding my bike, playing basketball, or even
searching for bugs in our very large backyard. Although now I do appreciate
dressing up for formal occasions, odds are you will not see me walking across
campus in a dress unless something important is happening.
So when I was told that my friend would be competing in the
Miss Thomasville pageant, a precursor for the Miss North Carolina, and
ultimately Miss America pageants, I was dumbfounded. I wondered why would
someone put themselves through such an ordeal? What is the purpose, or as some
British Social Anthropologists would say, What is the function?
A quick and easy answer is that participants are able to win
scholarship money which would allow them to continue with their educational pursuits. The Miss America foundation awards $340,000 in scholarships at the
National competition level, with Miss America herself walking away with a cool
$50,000 (http://www.missamerica.org/news/press-kit/scholarships.aspx).
However, many would quickly say the amount of money invested is often
far greater than the amount able to be won. In the Miss Thomasville pageant
competition, one of the contestants evening gown dress cost over $2,000 – far
greater than the award presented to the overall winner.
Malinowski, a (psychological) functionalist, would argue
that the pageants are an institution created by culture in order to meet the
basic needs required by all humans. It is quite easy to take Malinowski’s
interpretation and see how pageants would prepare women to have their
reproductive needs met by preparing them to present themselves more favorably
to any suitor, or even their intellectual growth by requiring pageant
contestants to be abreast of current events in the world today.
However, an individual like Emile Durkheim, one of the individuals
setting the stage for functionalism to rise as a theory of cultural explanation,
would see the pageant scene as an example of how our cultural values expressed through functions of our society on the larger scale. Beauty and sex are
two major concepts that although no one would outright say we “value”, they are concepts that we as a society put great emphasis on, and incorporate into almost every
part of our society
By applying Durkheim’s idea of social facts, shared beliefs
and values that shape and regulate society, it is evident that beauty and
sexuality is a social fact that is ever present today. This is particularly
exemplified by the media surrounding us. You can’t leaf through any magazine
without seeing advertising featuring scantily clad women and men in insinuating
positions. Often times, I am not even quite sure what an advertisement is
selling until the end of the commercial because the commercial doesn’t even
feature the product until the last few seconds!
A great example is a website that hosts a quiz which asks
“Fashion or Porn?”. The quiz shows a
small section of an image and you have to guess if it’s from a fashion
advertising image or actually pornography. I won’t link to the website because
it is very NSFW (Not Safe For Work), as it shows a lot of nudity and, as the title suggests, pornography. However, it
shows how similar pornography and advertising can be, and how many are now almost interchangeable with pornography. A good example to
see, without going to that particular website, would be any of the American
Apparel advertising photos posted on their website (http://store.americanapparel.net/).
Through the over-saturation of the advertising world with sexually-charged
images, you can see through Durkheim’s explanation, the high value placed upon
sexuality in our society and culture, and how it shapes and regulates members
of society.
Thus, it’s very easy to understand why pageants exist and are
quite popular throughout America through the functionalist view. My friend
thought it would be a great opportunity to practice her public speaking and
modeling skills, to which I applaud her, and congratulate her on her winning
Miss Congeniality. This example just shows that any activity can have many
functions to different individuals and can be interpreted and explained by any
number of functionalist viewpoints.
You make a lot of excellent points in your post. It can be difficult to take an area or subject such as pageantry and apply it to functionalist and cultural theory without being immersed in it yourself. I also find that pageantry is set up in a way in which it functions as a way for a woman to learn through various competitions proper etiquette that in turn will help her find a mate and fulfill her reproductive needs. From a psychological- functionalist view point this deals directly with the individual and their basic needs as Malinowski points out in theory. Malinowski believed that there was no institution that was functionless nor were there any functionless traits. Having said this from your post we can see that the pageant functions as a means of self-expression where the individual displays both sex and beauty (not sex in a literal sense) two things that Durkheim would label as social facts, or things that we value and allow to shape our society. However, I also believe it can be taken a step further and be looked at from a structuralist point of view. Because the structural-functionalist would be most concerned with society, they may pose the question, “what is the function of a beauty pageant as it pertains to society?”
ReplyDeleteAgain it would seem that a pageant plays the role as an outlet, allowing for those in a society who place greater value on sex and beauty to express this. Here it seems that the function of a pageant from the individual’s perspective and the societal perspective are essentially one in the same. In both cases we find that the value society places on sex and beauty are the driving forces behind the individual’s desire to participate in the pageant and societies desire to either take part or show support. I find this interesting because we’d think the two different types of functionalism, the individual function and the societal function, would be very different but in reality there are instances in which they are the same. This makes me think deeper into functionalism and ask questions such as, “Are the needs of the individual that separate from those of society?”, “Could they be the same in a sense but to different degrees?”, “And what other instances are there where the individual function and societal function are the same, and when are they completely separate?”